A.I. For Deluded Nutcases
Monday, August 23rd, 2004Some goon (sorry: Californian counsellor) has patented Inductive Inference Affective Language Analyzer Simulating Artificial Intelligence (including the Ten Ethical Laws Of Robotics). It’s nothing but unintelligible babble, interspersed by (inaccurate) references to artificial intelligence theory. The author (who also writes a book on family values with a distinct evangelic slant, from which most of the text of the patent seems to be taken) appears to know nothing about A.I. or computer science. In addition, I find his suggestion that ‘wooly’ and ‘vague’ rules and ‘commandments’ are sensible choices for A.I. safeguards -
While a meaningful future artificial intelligence may be more than capable of understanding rules set out in a way that a human might like to express it - indeed, for some machine intelligences (artificial or not) this capacity to understand human speech and expressions could be a very useful feature - this is not the level at which safeguards should be implemented.
(more…)

